Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 12,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
Ed Meese, Gary Lawson, and I have... [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
For an extensive analysis of the decision, see this TaxProf Blog op-ed by Steve Johnson (Florida State). [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
Washington Post Op-Ed: The Supreme Court Tax Case That Could Blow a Hole in the Federal Budget, by Natasha Sarin (Yale; Google Scholar): This summer, the high court agreed to hear Moore v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 9:48 am
Washington Ed. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:32 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Mayo Foundation for Medical Ed. and Research v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:30 am
Mickelson, and V. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
Ed. 2d___(Arkansas October 22, 2009), is an interesting Arkansas state supreme court decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:02 am
Jeannie Suk (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted 'The Look in His Eyes': The Story of State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v.... [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:10 am
My colleague Jack Chin has this op/ed in the Los Angeles Times on the "loaded weapon" known as Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
Here is an excerpt:The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
With regard to the state’s reliance on Ward v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Here is the abstract.This chapter for Criminal Law Stories (Robert Weisberg & Donna Coker eds., 2010), tells the story of State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm
In a highly anticipated case that generated much local notoriety, and in which some of my friends and colleagues participated, the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:26 am
ND v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
” The Court reasoned that a bright-line rule requiring physical presence in the state was necessary because it “encourage[d] settled expectations and . . . foster[ed] investment by businesses and individuals. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Ed Klaris is the founding partner of Klaris Law PLLC. [read post]
