Search for: "EEOC v. May and Co., Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
” Defendant Failure to Produce in Agreed Upon Format Leads to Dispute with Plaintiffs: In EEOC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Ct. 2459 (2014), Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 11:58 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and EEOC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
An Employer's Misstep Discussed… — via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Employer Need Not Pay for Worker Security Screenings: Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:47 am
According to the EEOC, the class action (EEOC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
See, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
The summary of rights eventually sent to applicants was also purportedly outdated (Marcum v Dolgencorp, Inc dba Dollar General). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:19 am
His GINA claim also advanced because neither party sufficiently briefed the issues of whether the doctor who performed a physical was an “agent” of the employer, whether the employer’s receipt of his medical form was inadvertent, and whether the information was actually “genetic information” as defined under GINA (Maxwell v Verde Valley Ambulance Co, Inc, September 10, 2014, Bade, B). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Patchak (OT 2011) EEOC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Patchak (OT 2011) EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:51 am
Limited, non-exclusive right to republished granted to Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:33 am
Co. of Am., Inc., 297 N.J. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The EEOC filed a complaint last week on behalf of three female employees against United Health Programs of America, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am
EEOC v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
In B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Most recently regarding cafeteria plans, Notice 2014-01 discusses when plan sponsors may need to amend their cafeteria plan documents to allow mid-year election changes by same-sex spouses. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am
’” Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
”Read More: Justices Back Rule Limiting Coal PollutionHighmark, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
Though the future employer might be liable under a “joint employer” theory, further factual development was needed to make that determination (EEOC v Grane Healthcare Co). [read post]
