Search for: "ELL v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court (Prince v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
There were four big takeaways for me from this session: --The Google v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
See Snyder v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
Elle Belle, LLC, Cancellation No. 92042991, 85 USPQ2d 1090 (TTAB Apr. 9, 2007) [precedential]; Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
20; Bessette v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Israel Registrar of Trademarks cancels car glass marks on grounds of non-use: Ilan Car Glaziery Ltd v Carglass Luxemburg Sarl (IP Factor) Japan Japan Patent Office releases ‘Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model’ (Patent Baristas) Amendment to Japanese IP law creates new after final deadlines for foreign applicants (Patent Docs) Korea Korea’s Patent Court adopts ethics code (PatLit) Mexico … [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:34 am
J.R. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:11 am
The district court initially stated that `[t]here is certainly not evidence that there was a conspiracy. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Lauzon v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
From Dodge v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The New York Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for individuals with cerebral palsy within the State of New York. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Rudy Giuliani’s ‘Borat 2’ scene: What can he do about it legally? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
