Search for: "EPA v. California"
Results 201 - 220
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
With respect to the decision coming out of California, in American Small Business League v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit would decide Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Under the test set forth in Henry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:07 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Walters highlights Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
However, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
However, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:15 am
EPA and Murray Energy Corporation v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Burchi, and James V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
On August 8, 2019, New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia (States) also filed a new petition for judicial review concerning the refusal of EPA to ban chlorpyrifos. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:10 pm
Backstrom, James V. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Clorox Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:56 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided the case of California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Additional Resources: U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Considerations for a farm-to-table approach to Reducing the Risk of E. coli O157:H7/STEC Associated with Leafy GreensThe leafy greens sector has invested a great deal of resources in the development and implementation of initiatives such as the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement (LGMA) and the Arizona LGMA. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At Allen Matkins, Keith Bishop notes that the decision “almost certainly invalidates California’s ban [on immoral and scandalous marks] as well. [read post]
