Search for: "Edelman v. Edelman" Results 201 - 220 of 270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am by Anna Christensen
United States to include the decision and a recap by Will Edelman, also from Stanford. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38), we find that the complaint sufficiently stated distinct causes of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Will Edelman of Stanford Law School recaps yesterday’s ruling in Carr v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:47 pm by Robert Ambrogi
This week on the legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the Supreme Court’s May 24 opinion in American Needle v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:15 am by Legal Talk Network
With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:10 am
With a unanimous vote, the Surpreme Court ruled 9-0 against the NFL in the American Needle v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from NEIL EDELMAN, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The case of Edelman v Croonquist concerned a defamation action against a stand-up comedian for making mother-in-law jokes. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:48 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Employee Job Loyalty Can Impact Your Business - Marylee Abrams of Abrams & Schmidt on the firm's Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog Employers Incur Risk if they Pursue Action Against an Employee for Off-Duty Web Comments - Texas lawyer Tom Crane on his San Antonio Employment Law Blog Justice Sotomayor Exercises Judicial Restraint In Shady Grove v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 A.D.3d 1, 865 N.Y.S.2d 14, 21 (App. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Edelman v Poster ;  2010 NY Slip Op 00788 ;  Decided on February 4, 2010 ;  Appellate Division, First Department  we see a situation in which a matrimonial retainer agreement boldly stated a right to arbitrate, yet the Appellate Division, First Department, determined that client has no right to arbitrate. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Roth failed to satisfy her burden by offering any proof that Sieradzki's testimony would be "necessary" (Bentvena v Edelman, 47 AD3d 651, 652). [read post]