Search for: "Edward T. Kennedy" Results 201 - 220 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Dec. 357 (BIA 1996). 7 Matter of A-T, 24 I & N Dec. 275 (BIA 2007). 8 Bah v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:54 pm by Eva Arevuo
If they don’t, Justice Kennedy said, they will run afoul of the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel during criminal proceedings. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
If they don't, Kennedy said, they will run afoul of the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel during criminal proceedings. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
If they don't, Kennedy said, they will run afoul of the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel during criminal proceedings. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Of this book, the American Monthly reviewer wrote: [T]he work is a rare union of patience, brilliancy, and acuteness, and . . . [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:16 am by Mandelman
  At least that’s how it would go in a Martin Scorsese picture about President Kennedy, which is how I like to think of JFK. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:06 pm
As reported by The Cairns Post: A fixed radar on a police car clocked [Steven Edward ] Osgood [54] driving at 93km/h in an 80km/h zone on the Kennedy Highway near Kuranda in June, 2006. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:31 am by brown
Kennedy isn’t usually on board with the promotion of religion in public schools, and even conservatives like Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:09 pm by Larry Ribstein
It has had a distinguished liberal pedigree, having been advocated by, among others, President Jimmy Carter, Senator Edward Kennedy, political scientist Theodore Lowi, and Common Cause (Breyer 1982; Kysar 2005). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
Waxman responded that this “may very well be what was in his thought process, but we don’t know that,” prompting Justice Kennedy to say that “we know what was in his thought process” based on the lengthy opinion he filed deciding the habeas case. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Christopher Wright
”  But Justice Kennedy found Lamken’s later statement that, by itself, “an invasion of a statutory right can be injury in fact” unsatisfying, saying that “[t]he Constitution requires injury. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:14 am by Mandelman
  Nah… they wouldn’t do that… again… would they? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by Ashby Jones
According to Harvard Law School’s Noah Feldman, writing at Bloomberg: Kavanaugh was sending a distinct message to [Justice Anthony] Kennedy: You don’t have to go there. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am by pfriedman
” and give one answer, provided by performance artist Guillermo Gómez Peña: [T]he artist doesn’t really give answers. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:48 pm by Ilya Somin
Edwards is right to stress the need for limits on the Commerce power. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm by Randy Barnett
 Judge Edwards clearly telegraphed his view that little needed to be said to find that the ACA is constitutional (as he said very little art argument or in his concurrence). [read post]