Search for: "Eisenberg v. Eisenberg"
Results 201 - 220
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 3:16 am
Issues of fact exist, however, as to whether Striano was involved in certain decisions regarding the handling of the mortgage foreclosure actions filed against the borrower and, if so, whether those decisions constituted an intervening cause of the plaintiffs' injuries (see Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734; Selletti v Liotti, 22 AD3d 739, 740; Blank v Harry Katz, P.C., 3 AD3d 512, 513). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm
Eisenberg said. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:04 am
Eisenberg, University of Michigan law professor. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:19 am
See Perez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The first case, Holder v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(See Eisenberg, et al., Cal. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
In Wong v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Nicholas Eisenberger & David Gottesman, Harvard Business Publishing, December 7, 2009 There are plenty of reasons to be disappointed with the Copenhagen climate talks that start today: the meeting will not result in a binding agreement, the timeframe for such an agreement is potentially years away, and of course, neither the US nor China has committed to binding reductions. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:57 pm
The D.C. case, Horn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Check the Beard v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:19 am
Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Jennifer Eisenberg of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:02 pm
" The WSJ's brief summary of Ted's critique of the survey follows:"Eisenberg concludes that the survey itself is logically inconsistent. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Pergament v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Eisenberg tried to get U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:01 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:46 pm
" Delgozzo, supra, 266 Super. at 187; see also Eisenberg, supra, 766 F. 2d at 786 (explaining that typicality is present where the factual circumstances of the class representatives are not "markedly different" from other members of the class); Weiss v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:24 pm
The author is UW School of Law graduate Adam Eisenberg, who says that he got the idea for the book when he was working as a prosecutor. [read post]
