Search for: "Elias v. Elia" Results 201 - 220 of 398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 12:36 am by Tessa Shepperson
That confirms the position which we all assumed from the case of Elias v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tenenbaum, The Union of Contraceptive Services and the Affordable Care Act Gives Birth to First Amendment Concerns, (Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 539, 2013).Frederick Mark Gedicks & Pasquale Annicchino, Lautsi v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:26 am by Immigration Prof
The New Immigration Federalism by Stella Burch Elias, University of Iowa - College of Law October 1, 2013 Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 74, 2013 Abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent rulings in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
Elia is known for his intimate familiarity with case issues"); second, an article on Kurwa v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:28 pm by Maritime Law Staff
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NEW ORLEANS DIVISION Louisiana maritime lawyer, Gordon, Elias & Seely, LLP, represents a 47-year-old man from Brooklyn, Connecticut who was injured on the M/V GULF FREEDOM while employed by DEFENDANT, MADCON Corporation. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:56 am by Michael Scutt
Lord Justice Elias gave the lead Judgment and found in favour of Clyde & Co. [read post]