Search for: "Employees' Retirement v. Brown"
Results 201 - 220
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Macy's Inc., is a putative class action regarding employees of companies acquired by Macy's under the Employee Retirement Savings Investment Act (ERISA). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Supremes’ grant of cert in two important personal jurisdiction cases: Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm
The opinions in LawLawLaw do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Clock Tower Law Group, its employees, or the author. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Pedreira; Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
Concerning name-clearing hearingsBrowne v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 04583, Decided on May 25, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department [Browne II]In general, a name-clearing hearing is to provide an employee who claims that he or she has been “stigmatized” by his or her employer with an opportunity to clear his or her name* The individual seeking such a hearing has the burden of proof in the proceeding.Typically the individual seeks a name-clearing… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. (09-683) and Amara v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:09 am
The court relied upon Browning v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:25 pm
Brown, but also looking at alternative solutions. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:21 pm
Brown, but also looking at alternative solutions. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
His reasoning laid the foundation for the historic 1954 Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
General Motors Corporation Issue: Does the Americans with Disabilities Act permit an employer to reduce the retirement benefits of disabled workers because they receive federal disability benefits and do the ADA’s anti-discrimination protections apply to disabled former employees? [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
In the first case (Kasic v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
In Hoff v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clauseo April 1, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereo Noted here: Law.com; Washington Post; Mayer Brown; Business Insurance; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Jottings By An Employment Lawyer; Paul Mollica; Ogletree DeakinsArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
