Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm
On November 19th the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ruled on the scope of a contractual non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in the context of a damage claim for breach of EU competition law (Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450). [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:52 am
Subsequently Catalyst issued declaratory proceedings in England, seeking, among other things, declarations that it had no liability to Mr Lewinsohn. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
In Thorpe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:21 am
We grant AT&T’s petition for review, vacate the Board’s decision and order with respect to the “Inmate/Prisoner” shirts, and deny the Board’s cross-application for enforcement.Southern New England Telephone Company v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit’s ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
These include Football Dataco v Sportradar GmbH & Sportradar AG, C-173/11, and Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Sclüter GmbH & Co.KG, C-585/08. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In his 2010 judgment in Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB), [2010] EMLR 16) Mr Justice Tugendhat dismissed a claim for a super-injunction by the then England football captain John Terry, taking the opportunity to conduct a wide ranging survey of the relevant law and to criticise the approach of the claimant’s lawyers. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:36 am
Brian CorderyBristowsby Steven Willis Judgments from the Courts of England and Wales concerned with the construction of patents will invariably cite the classic formulation of Lord Diplock from Catnic Components v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] R.P.C. when addressing the identity of the person skilled in the art: “…a patent specification is a unilateral statement by the patentee, in words of his own choosing, addressed to those likely to have a practical interest in the… [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 6:37 pm
In Rosas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
This is Giovanna Shay, Associate Professor of Law at Western New England University School of Law, signing in as a guest blogger for the month of October. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
In Sun Capital Partners III, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
Judgment Warby J considered that Mr Mitchell was domiciled or at least present in England and Wales, and therefore that the English Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
Although validity was attempted as a squeeze on infringement, there was not a lot of interest of law or application on these points to report.So, valid and infringed.Actavis v Lilly - the giftthat just keeps giving to patent lawThey thought it was all over...the Barrell jurisdiction pointIn England & Wales, the Court will disclose to the parties (normally through their representatives) a draft judgment under strict terms that the contents (or even a hint of the… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:30 pm
June 15, 2011 - Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales (ICLR) is beginning to remove its official case law publications from international licensees. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
(See Miller, 240 F.3d at 402; England v. [read post]
