Search for: "Espinoza"
Results 201 - 220
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2020, 4:15 am
Después de escuchar a algunos parlamentarios, tengo la siguiente impresión: Somos Perú tiene gente bien informada y con capacidad de transmitir ideas, salvo, siempre a mi juicio, Renan Espinoza, para mí un torpe para no llamarlo como corresponde. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:34 am
Discussants:Carmen Espinoza, Executive Director of Manuela Ramos in PeruShafiqa Noori, Director of Humanitarian Assistance for Women and Children of Afghanistan Diane Rosenfeld, Lecturer on Law and Director of the Gender Violence Program at Harvard Law SchoolRanda Siniora, Executive Director of the Women’s Center for Legal Aid and Counseling in PalestineRegistration is required. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
I presume the court was holding it — perhaps for Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The school funding dispute in Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:57 am
This term, the Court will decide a case on Blaine Amendments, Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:23 am
¿Desea usted Maritza Espinoza contribuir a la desaparición de las "Corridas de Toros"?.... [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court] From Peace Cross to Espinoza: where religious exercise and the Establishment Clause are headed in the Roberts Court [Federalist Society conference panel video and transcript with Stephanie Barclay, Luke Goodrich, Micah Schwartzman, and William P. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Sarah Vowell weighs in on Espinoza v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
At Law & Liberty (via How Appealing), John McGinnis explains why a holding in Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:48 am
McGinnis has a post that begins, “The Supreme Court has recently heard arguments in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
For those who are interested, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a new episode for our Legal Spirits podcast series on last month's oral argument in the Blaine Amendments case, Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am
At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard and Nick Eicher analyze two developments last month at the court: Justice Neil Gorsuch’s concurring opinion, “a colorful response to federal judges who use injunctions to stall out presidential policies,” in the court’s decision to allow the federal government to enforce its new “public charge” rule while litigation on the rule proceeds, as well as the oral argument on January 22 in the… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am
” At Verdict, Michael Dorf considers “how much freedom” Montana has to “level down” – that is, deny benefits to all groups when confronted with allegations of discrimination arising from unequal treatment – “in response to a finding of impermissible discrimination” in Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
For my first contribution, I thought I'd post a brief comment about Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse wonders about the “stopping point” of the administration’s argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
