Search for: "Estate of Wallace" Results 201 - 203 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
It did so in a case where the husband wanted to ensure that the financial agreement he and his wife had signed just before marriage in 2005 was not binding, so that he would not have to pay his wife in excess of $3 million from his $16 million fortune.Justice Benjamin, in the recent case of Wallace and Stelzer, was asked to decide if the financial agreement were binding, and that the changes to the Family Law Act were invalid. [read post]