Search for: "Ex parte Rowe" Results 201 - 220 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Clear principles limiting the exercise of this power were established in the case of R v Governor of Durham Prisoner ex parte Haridal Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 (now often referred to as “the Hardial Singh principles”). [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm by Michelle Briggs
"  Castillo has recently tweeted such gems as:"@kill About tired as shyt n I can't sleep""Man so much to plan so much deal so much negotiation n I want a plan when I still have part of it n stiL be making bank""Don't bother telling me who my ex is now dating! [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954), in which the Court held that ex parte communications with jurors are “presumptively prejudicial. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:43 am by Steve Hall
Buck, who killed two people, including his ex girlfriend, in 1995, has not received a new sentencing hearing. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Example: Harper & Row. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(China Hearsay) China takes knock-offs to new level with fake American news bureau (China Hearsay) (IP Dragon) IKEA drama: Second tier cities cannot wait for well known brands: enter the copycat (IP Dragon) Wrong reasons, right conclusion: Why China imitates western brands (IP Dragon)   Europe General Court upholds findings of likelihood of confusion for identical goods: Ergo v Urgo (Class 46) Summer: the season for catching up on GIs (Class 46)   Greece The Greek Communication Review… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(China Hearsay) China takes knock-offs to new level with fake American news bureau (China Hearsay) (IP Dragon) IKEA drama: Second tier cities cannot wait for well known brands: enter the copycat (IP Dragon) Wrong reasons, right conclusion: Why China imitates western brands (IP Dragon)   Europe General Court upholds findings of likelihood of confusion for identical goods: Ergo v Urgo (Class 46) Summer: the season for catching up on GIs (Class 46)   Greece The Greek Communication Review… [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 6:09 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
These are some of the things I was tweeting about yesterday: looking at the program for the brisbane writers festival http://bit.ly/Fm4BF two porn related tweets in a row - people will get the wrong idea: "Porn studio loses appeal in Google copyright case" http://flpbd.it/qnT6 how old fashioned - the atlantic seeks permission from copyright owners for its new web video aggregator http://flpbd.it/GcJH #lwb486 how, umm, sad? [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
Ozimals (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court N D California: Joinder of swarm improper but expedited ex parte discovery granted against peer to peer filesharer Doe Number 1: Pacific Century International Ltd v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm by cdw
” [via Tim Cone] Ex parte Carl Brad Ward; (In re: Carl Brad Ward v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:16 am by John Steele
  The court found that the lawyer actually used client confidential information as part of his public attacks. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Steve Hall
"This office will not be a party to the infliction of death as a punishment when there is even an appearance of impropriety on the part of a prosecutor who formerly worked in this office," District Attorney Joe Shannon said. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:49 am by Mark Ashton
It was announced on May 24, 2011 that new home sales rose for the second month in a row; a fact that startled many economists. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Mandelman
  You could think of it as a front row seat to the most severe economic catastrophe in the history of the world. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm by cdw
LEXIS 1122 (La. 5/10/2011) Remand ordered to conduct an evidentiary hearing on failure to investigate and present mitigation evidence Ex parte Andrew Anthony Apicella; (In re: Andrew Anthony Apicella v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am by Steve Hall
The court filings call the meetings ``ex parte communications'' that are barred under court rules because judges are expected to rule only on information in the formal record. [read post]