Search for: "Ex parte SMITH."
Results 201 - 220
of 1,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 3:43 pm
” This is a higher standard than the ex parte “substantial new question of patentability. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
This procedure is known as ex parte reexamination. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
Another benefit of combining forces may be for the group (if regulatory burdens became overwhelming) to employ a part time ex-solicitor working from home to develop expertise in money laundering, SRA rules etc. [read post]
2 May 2019, 1:22 pm
FINRA said that the brokerage firm and Buckman neglected to identify when one of the ex-representatives was taking part in short-term Unit Investment Trust (UIT) trading on a frequent basis, as well as engaging in “other long-term investments” that charged customers substantial, upfront expenses. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
"If I don't threaten you … I have First Amendment" protections, said Kaflowitz, of Caruso Smith Picini in Fairfield. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
Smith (Ariz. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:27 pm
Hunt’s case has sparked massive media attention, in part because the 19-year-old is gay. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
On September 30, 2009, the CCA handed down several orders including three published opinions in the following cases: AP-76,102, Ex parte Gregory Lynn Smith: The CCA denied habeas corpus relief in this felon in possession of a firearms case. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Practices: This bill retains existing ex parte reexamination, adds preissuance submissions by third parties, and adds post-grant review. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:12 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Practices: This bill retains existing ex parte reexamination, adds preissuance submissions by third parties, and adds post-grant review. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Ex Parte Appeals Backlog: For the first time in a decade, the backlog of ex parte appeals before the PTAB have begun to drop and are now below 23,000 pending cases. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:55 pm
Even if your ex agrees to less, a judge must officially amend the reduction or you could be held in contempt of court with the possibility of jail. 14. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
US Ex Rel. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:25 am
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:45 pm
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 4:12 am
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
The two opinions, Smith v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:15 am
In the previous Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Changes to Implement Miscellaneous Post Patent Provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (here), the Office proposed the following rule to track potential EXP estoppel, 37 C.F.R § 1.510(b). (6) A certification that the statutory estoppel provisions of both inter partes review (35 U.S.C. 315(e)(1)) and post grant review (35 U.S.C. 325(e)(1)) do not prohibit the ex parte reexamination. (7) A… [read post]
