Search for: "F v. F" Results 201 - 220 of 57,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
This is the fourth part of a multi-part blog post series discussing the implications and fallout from the Final Rule recently adopted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banning the enforcement of almost all noncompete agreements with workers. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
This is the fourth part of a multi-part blog post series discussing the implications and fallout from the Final Rule recently adopted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banning the enforcement of almost all noncompete agreements with workers. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
This is the fourth part of a multi-part blog post series discussing the implications and fallout from the Final Rule recently adopted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banning the enforcement of almost all noncompete agreements with workers. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
This is the fourth part of a multi-part blog post series discussing the implications and fallout from the Final Rule recently adopted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) banning the enforcement of almost all noncompete agreements with workers. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Regner, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, May 13, 2024 Tags: Court of Chancery, delaware, Delaware Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Disclosure, Inovalon, Nordic Capital Seven Questions about Proxy Advisors Posted by David F. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Regner, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, on Monday, May 13, 2024 Tags: Court of Chancery, delaware, Delaware Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Disclosure, Inovalon, Nordic Capital Seven Questions about Proxy Advisors Posted by David F. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
In its judgment in C-173/23 Eventmedia Soluciones SL v Air Europa Líneas Aéreas SAU ECLI:EU:C:2024:295 (Judgment), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled on some aspects of the duty of national courts to assess of their own motion the unfairness of contractual terms in the context of air carriage under the 1999 Montreal Convention on the liability of the international air carrier (MC99). [read post]