Search for: "FEDERAL CONTRACTING, INC. v. USA" Results 201 - 220 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” In Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc. , the justices ruled 7-1 that U.S. and overseas sales of a product extinguish the patentholder’s rights to sue for infringement. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
, 644 S.W.2d 705, 706 (Tex. 1982); Houston Omni USA Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:30 am by Joseph Robinson
USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reversed the district court and held that Helsinn’s pre-AIA patent claims, “were subject to an invalidating contract for sale prior to the critical date,” and furthermore, “the AIA did not change the statutory meaning of ‘on sale’ in the circumstances involved here. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:26 am by Eric Caligiuri
(“Helsinn”) brought suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:26 am by Eric Caligiuri
(“Helsinn”) brought suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 8:10 am by Wystan Ackerman
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., Nos. 16-285, 16-300, and 16-307 (SCOTUSblog page) involve whether an agreement to arbitrate employment-related disputes, which requires individual arbitration, and provides for a waiver of class action and collective action claims, is enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act notwithstanding the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Consolidating three cases in its order granting certiorari, the Court implicitly honored the NLRB’s bid, in NLRB v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., for a ruling on the three petitions in NLRB v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]