Search for: "Farnsworth"
Results 201 - 220
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
See generally Farnsworth’s Fourth Edition, § 5.4. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:47 am
For example, Allan Farnsworth once wrote, "[Courts] have more often ignored [the interpretation-construction] by characteizing the process of 'construction' as that of 'interpretation' in order to obscure the extentof their control over private agreement. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:49 pm
I want to thank Judges Frank Easterbrook, Richard Posner, and Stephen Williams and Professors Einer Elhauge, William Eskridge and Ward Farnsworth for participating. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:15 pm
In his latest post, Professor Farnsworth says: "I expect that the Justices who decided the gun use case could have passed a polygraph test in which they said the semantic arguments were a substantial basis for their decisions. [read post]
1 May 2010, 12:04 pm
I take the key passage in Professor Farnsworth's reply to be the following: "Maybe he thinks these passages are insignificant; it's just stuff that judges are required to say by custom, but that has nothing to do with their actual reasons for decision. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:26 am
Judge Posner disputes that judges argue much about the "normal" usage of words; when they argue about words, there is always a "complex background understanding" at work of the motives of the drafter and the function of the interpreter. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
I would be interested in Farnsworth's approach to the Raffles case. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog is hosting a debate over a new paper, Ambiguity About Ambiguity: An Empirical Inquiry Into Legal Interpretation written by Ward Farnsworth, Dustin F. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
Ok, so I think with Professor Farnsworth’s two responses, we can move past the first two ambiguities. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
Some of Professor Farnsworth's recent reply to Professor Elhauge also speaks to points raised by Professor Eskridge. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:11 am
" For Ward Farnsworth reports (in his response to Einer Elhauge) that the internal judgment not only leads respondents to report less ambiguity but also leads them to treat texts as "clearly" meaning what the respondents think is the better policy. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm
Circuit), as well as a response to the responses from Ward Farnsworth of Boston University. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:29 am
I gather from Professor Farnsworth’s post that their follow up article will resolve my first ambiguity, finding that interpreters who see less ambiguity are more likely to make decisions that reflect their own political views. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
Farnsworth, Guzior and Malani have written a fascinating article that makes an important contribution to the literature. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
The questions that interest me and my co-authors (Ward Farnsworth and Dustin Guzior) involve the relationships between those issues. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Malani's co-author on the paper, Ward Farnsworth of Boston University, and Judge Frank Easterbrook will also be joining the debate. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:30 am
Ward Farnsworth. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:21 am
To help reduce this gap, I associate with thought leaders like Scott Farnsworth of the Sunbridge Legacy Building. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
Original post by Scott Farnsworth. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
Farnsworth suggested that that the realists played a role in downplaying the distinction between linguistic meaning in his discussions of the interpretation-construction distinction in contract law. [read post]
