Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 18,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
See County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
[8] Comcast v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:44 pm
In a second case, Hardt v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:06 am
" Alzheimer's Institute of America v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:10 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
They argue that, because the Supreme Court stated that Civil Code section 1717 bars contractual attorneys' fees in voluntarily dismissed cases only with respect to "causes of action sounding in contract" (Santisas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:37 pm
In Ramos v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The District Court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims under the rule of Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Supreme Court held in 1975 that lawyers’ minimum fee schedules violated the antitrust laws (Goldfarb v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:11 am
The Fourth Circuit held that a large stormwater management fee (stated to be $417,000.00 for the year 2017) levied by the City of Roanoke against the railroad to assist in the financing of the City’s permitted municipal stormwater management system was a permissible fee and not a discriminatory tax placed on the railroad. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:04 am
Accordingly, his claim for breach of contract fails to state a cause of action (Eisen v Feder, 307 AD2d 817, 818 [2003]); Lessoff v Berger, 2 AD3d 127 [2003]). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:50 am
In Harris v. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 3:58 am
MV Senior Management, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:30 am
State of Oklahoma) claiming the cigarette fee is unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
Missouri (08-822) and Anderson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:14 pm
United Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:35 am
Back in May we discussed ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm
In the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:57 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court in the recent case of Ferman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:11 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
