Search for: "First Amendment Foundation of Florida v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
McCormick Foundation, 16-317. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
McCormick Foundation, 16-317 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
The amendment made the proposed remedy illegal under state law.Today, California has one of the most racially segregated school systems in the country. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Knight First Amendment Institute (2021) (Thomas, J., concurring) Lee C. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm by Jillian Stonecipher
Additionally, given the strong First Amendment protection for speech, which requires that actionable defamatory statements be made at least negligently (Gertz v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, on September 24, 1789, Congress authorized the transmission of proposed amendments that would create the Bill of Rights to all thirteen states. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Florida (1996), the Secretary of the Interior may establish procedures for Indian gaming if a state declines to enter a compact with the Tribe and invokes immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:50 am by Kevin
In Florida (and I think most states have a similar law), anyone who “intentionally or knowingly maliciously touches, strikes, or causes bodily harm to a police canine, fire canine, [search-and-rescue] canine, or police horse” has committed a first-degree misdemeanor. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Today is the first day of the Michaelmas Legal Term and the beginning of the legal year. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]