Search for: "First Family Restaurants, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2017, 4:59 am
The Board observed that LC bore the "substantial burden" to prove "first, that its claimed family of 'double word' marks has acquired distinctiveness, and second, that the public recognition of that family helps the subject 'family member' mark, in turn, acquire distinctiveness. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/pEO8XaqpZA -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-12-25 | Barry Sookman https://t.co/ML09TbIgeq -> Anton Piller order quashed Advantec Wireless Inc. c. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
But the DeCoster name was also known for the family businesses that had environmental, labor, and food safety violations from Iowa to Maine. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendant’s bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendant’s bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:06 pm by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
McCabe 415, Inc., 168 So. 3d 238, summary judgment for the defendant/bar was reversed by the appeals court based on affidavits produced by the plaintiff’s family that the plaintiff (killed in a car wreck while intoxicated) was a habitual drunkard who frequented the defendant’s bar regularly where he was served excessive alcoholic beverages. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
McKellips attended the game and met C.H. and her family at a restaurant afterwards. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Charlie’s The Lakes Restaurant, Inc., 451 So.2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 461 So.2d 113 (Fla. 1984). [read post]