Search for: "Fish v. Government Employees" Results 201 - 220 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
Stephens, 13-7211 (granted at the March 21 Conference, relisted once); Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Deleon, 13-1516, a case asking whether it is an “adverse employment action” or a “materially adverse action” when an employer grants an employee’s request for a job transfer that he winds up disliking. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Oklahoma: designated K-12 employees who have carry permits and extra training may carry at school functions. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
The 5th Circuit also affirmed a preliminary injunction forbidding the government from enforcing the vaccination requirement against any federal employee nationwide. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
  Unlike certain fish-fry establishments, the Court can be very generous about repeat visits to its all-you-can-eat relist bar:  up for a seventh helping since the Court denied the petitioner in forma pauperis status is Fairey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Emanuel did not add, but might have, that it was not, after all, as if anyone had sent Romney a dead fish. [read post]
Examples: brief by the Civil Procedure and Securities Law Professors in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am by INFORRM
Supreme Court On 19 January 2011, the US Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of NASA v Nelson (09-530, see ScotUS Wiki) upholding NASA’s background checks for employees of companies working under contract. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
"To catch a big fish, you need to put a lot of bait in the water. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The Government of Canada has intervened in the Federal Court case with an amicus brief addressing both international legal issues and the potential economic damage to both Canada and the United States if Line 5 is shut down.[5] Canada’s brief raises U.S. treaty obligations pursuant to the 1977 Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of Canada concerning Transit Pipelines,[6] both countries’ interests related to energy security,… [read post]