Search for: "Foote v. Grant" Results 201 - 220 of 1,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm by Florian Mueller
The saving (on what the developer owes Google) is just not going to make a difference.The same would happen in the U.S. if the Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:10 am by Amy Howe
It was the only new case in which the justices granted review. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
More surprisingly, the court granted cert in Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html Corey Lee Dove v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm by Mills & Mills LLP
Trademark History As ubiquitous as the El Mo is to College and Spadina, so too is the massive 40 foot neon-lit palm tree sign to the fabled club’s entrance. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
A relist greatly increases the odds of a grant, but a CVSG may increase the odds of a grant even more. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
Also, the 1977 Act was based on the footing that patents can only be granted to persons. s.7(2)(a)(b)(c) only concern persons since only persons can have, grant, or be granted rights ([21] – [22]). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
Lastly, the court only rarely grants petitions asking them to reconsider a decision denying review of a case. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm by Jennifer Lynch
The First Circuit granted en banc review of the panel decision, and we are currently waiting for the court to issue its opinion. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
MPP Likely Violates the Immigration and Nationality Act MPP has stood on questionable legal footing since its inception. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:13 am by John Hochfelder
In Pimenta v. 1504 Cia, LLC (2d Dept. 2021), the appellate court affirmed the trial judge’s reduction. [read post]