Search for: "Force v. Department of Revenue"
Results 201 - 220
of 696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am
A business interruption insurance policy for a California business owner typically covers: Revenue loss. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Montana Department of Revenue, in which the court held last week that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools from a state-funded scholarship program for private schools violates the First Amendment, comes from James Phillips at PrawfsBlawg and Anthony Sanders at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:41 pm
Montana Department of Revenue marks an alarming sea change in the law and calls into question the continued validity of similar provisions in dozens of other state constitutions, which aim to prohibit government funding for religious institutions. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:05 am
Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:05 am
Furthermore, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have already learned a great deal from the first round of rebates. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE City of Oakland v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
COVID-19 as foreseeable or unforeseeable Some force majeure clauses expressly require that force majeure be unforeseeable. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:41 am
Is the COVID pandemic a force majeure? [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Trump likes to talk about being a wartime president and forcing Americans to be “warriors,” so let us think about this in the context of a military metaphor. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 2:37 pm
The 2nd DCA concluded that the legislature could not substantively alter or materially limit the class of individuals eligible for the exemption under the plain language of the constitution.Department of Revenue v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
” And in Veix v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:17 am
Grutter v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:16 pm
See Marchand v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
The combination and interaction of various child tax benefits—including the CTC, Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC)—results in complexity, vagueness, duplication, and inefficiency for filers and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
