Search for: "Forms, Inc., v. American Standard, Inc"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 9:56 am
According to Section 905, merely bringing together only a few standard forms or shapes with minor linear or spatial variations does not exhibit a sufficient amount of creative expression. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:05 am
Gafcon, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 7:59 am
Apple Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am
As usual, the key question is: was the User Agreement properly formed? [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
"8 Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
Chamber of Commerce, American Trucking Associations, Inc., and Business Roundtable (here). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:54 am
The issues on appeal are: (1) Whether the Court’s decision in Stewart Organization, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Materials subject to more demanding requirements might be eligible for classification as unavailable, or at least not routinely available, for purposes of the exemption 5 standard. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Indian Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492, 503 (1988). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
Avaya, Inc., 564 F.3d 242, 256 (3d Cir. 2009) [blog article here]; Southland Securities Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
See Snyder v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
American Nat’l Red Cross, 402 P.2d 584 (Ariz. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
Doe I (and the companion case Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Precision Airmotive Corp., 42 P.3d 1071, 1071 (Alaska 2002) (§20); Savage Arms, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard,… [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
(summary judgment for debt buyer reversed based on insufficiency of the evidence under the summary judgment standard) Tully v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Salvador's employer, Tatum Excavating, Inc. and Tatum Excavating, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
The Kat refers, in particular, to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in The Association of Molecular Pathology & Ors v The USPTO and Myriad Genetics Inc, __ F.3d __ (available here) (CAFC, 2011). [read post]
