Search for: "Foster v. Illinois" Results 201 - 220 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 9:27 am by familylawchildcustodydivorce
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal the case Foster v Wolkowitz in response to the defendant’s request. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:27 am by familylawchildcustodydivorce
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal the case Foster v Wolkowitz in response to the defendant’s request. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 11:04 am
Unless the 2004 change order augmented a forum selection provision in the 2001 contract, the Construction Contracts Act would not apply because it did not go into effect until 2002 and it does not apply retroactively, or so says the Illinois Second District’s opinion in Foster Wheeler v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:27 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Pfizer acquires rights to 55 generic pills, 20 injectibles through new deals with Claris Lifesciences and Aurobindo (GenericsWeb) Sytrinol (Polymethoxylated flavones, tocotrienols) – US: District Court N D Illinois rules patent co-owned by US not immunised from infringement or validity determinations (Patent Docs)  … [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]