Search for: "Frederick Schauer" Results 201 - 220 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2007, 9:33 am
"  Schauer, Frederick and Zeckhauser, Richard, Faculty Research Working Papers Series: Paltering, John F. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am by Jon
Farber and Suzanna Sherry, Judgment Calls: Principle and Politics in Constitutional Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 70-71.[41] Frederick Schauer, Precedent, 39 Stan. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:37 pm
"  Schauer, Frederick and Zeckhauser, Richard, Faculty Research Working Papers Series: Paltering, John F. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
If the DeCaro defendants are found to have also committed malpractice, the Meighan defendants and the DeCaro defendants may both be liable as successive tortfeasors who each contributed to the same injury (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 6; Soussis v Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., 66 AD3d 993, 994-995; Khlevner v Tylo, 16 Misc 3d 1129[A]). [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:15 pm
  Schauer, Frederick and Zeckhauser, Richard, Faculty Research Working Papers Series: Paltering, John F. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Jon
 [41] Frederick Schauer, Precedent, 39 Stan. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:34 pm
"--Frederick Schauer, author of Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry "Elegantly and clearly, Neil Netanel presents a scholarly middle ground in the copyright debates, avoiding both the misguided conservative view that copyright should be about either economic efficiency or natural rights of property and the copy-left view that no or minimal rights are proper. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:20 am
I think that Frederick Schauer's Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes should be mandatory reading for all law students. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:54 pm by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
Further reading: Frederick Schauer, Thinking like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning, (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
I am grateful to Jack Balkin for organizing this symposium and to the commenters on Rationing the Constitution for their close, careful, and generous engagement with my book. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Because, as University of Virginia Law Professor Frederick Schauer has written persuasively, to give a reason is to profess a commitment to the rule that underlies that reason. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 3:12 am by INFORRM
 It  includes chapters by Columbia Global Freedom of Expression experts Kyu Ho Youm and Toby Mendel on “The Global Influence of the United States on Freedom of Information,” and Frederick Schauer on “Positive Rights, Negative Rights, and the Right to Know. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
  Formalism and Its Discontents ,   Frederick Schauer   27. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
"  Schauer, Frederick and Zeckhauser, Richard, Faculty Research Working Papers Series: Paltering, John F. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction American law students learn about formalism and instrumentalism early on—although those particular terms may not be introduced explicitly in classroom discussion. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
But few liberals have dedicated sustained efforts to developing a sound understanding of legal formalism, and the subject has not drawn much attention in jurisprudence (with the notable exception of old work by Frederick Schauer).This brings me back to Solum's declaration that he is a legal formalist. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The Panel comprised of Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, University of California-Irvine School of Law; Professor Frederick Schauer, University of Virginia School of Law; Professor Alexander Tsesis, Loyola University Chicago School of Law; and Professor Laura Weinrib, The University of Chicago Law School, and was moderated by Prof. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:38 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction American law students learn about formalism and instrumentalism early on—although those particular terms may not be introduced explicitly in classroom discussion. [read post]