Search for: "GMBH" Results 201 - 220 of 2,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 5:08 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Judgment appealed: [2020] EWCA Civ 926 This case considers a claim for contribution brought against Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen GmbH (“AKV”) who, as a third party pursuant to the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (“the 1978 Act”), the defendants claim is liable in respect of the same damage as they are. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 8:15 am by Eugene Goryunov
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH (“Advanced Bionics”), the PTAB established a two-part framework for determining whether a PTAB panel should exercise discretion under Section 325(d). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 8:15 am by Eugene Goryunov
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH (“Advanced Bionics”), the PTAB established a two-part framework for determining whether a PTAB panel should exercise discretion under Section 325(d). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Wednesday 2nd November, the Supreme Court will hand-down two judgments: i) The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association – Forces Help and another v Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen GmbH – on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 926 The appeal concerns the interpretation of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (the 1978 Act). [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:34 am by Maike Lorenz (Hoffmann Eitle)
One significant manufacturer and distributer of “Spezi” is the brewery Paulaner Brauerei Gruppe GmbH & Co. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:05 pm by Patent Docs
Jakob Kellenberger of Procter & Gamble, Boris Kreye of Bird & Bird, and Bettina Wanner of Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH will focus on the Unified Patent Court and how it will change the way businesses operate in this new world. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:24 am by Nedim Malovic
The Court also recalled that distinctiveness needs to be evaluated not in abstract terms, but rather having regard to the average consumers of the concerned goods/services (and in this case the EUIPO had failed to identify them properly).BackgroundIn 2019, Magnetec GmbH (the applicant) sought to register the above colour mark as an EUTM.The application concerned goods in Classes 6 (Alloys; non-ferrous metal alloys; alloys in the form of rings for sheathing motor cables; common metal… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 10:00 pm
Red Bull GmbH [2002] EWHC 2155 (Ch) in which the courts rejected Monster Energy Company’s appeal to register the trademark “RED DAWG. [read post]