Search for: "GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 201 - 220
of 8,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 3:01 am
Under section 417 of the Uniform Trust Code (UTC), which has been adopted (either completely or in some form) in thirty-five states and the District of Columbia[1] as of the date of this writing, a trustee, after giving notice to the qualified beneficiaries, may combine two or more trusts into a single trust, “if the result does not impair rights of any beneficiary or adversely affect achievement of the purposes of the trust. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
So here is the list to see if you are residing in an anti-free speech state: Arizona Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Illinois Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico, New York Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Vermont Washington Wisconsin District of Columbia Here is the brief: Missouri v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
[T]he Fourth Circuit analogized Section 1001 to the Hobbs Act and obstruction-of-justice statutes to affirm a Section 1001 conviction in Maryland for false statements made in the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
On Wednesday, Trump’s legal team filed a response to a petition from special counsel Jack Smith, who has asked the Justices to expedite consideration of Trump’s argument that he is absolutely immune to the charges pending against him in federal court in the District of Columbia for his role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to weigh in. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:13 pm
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee during the Trump Administration. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Moreover, the officer’s use of pepper spray here complied with governing police procedures . . . [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Today, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:19 am
Abstract below: In response to provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), 40 states and the District of Columbia expanded their Medicaid programs – resulting in roughly 20 million American gaining state-run (but mostly federally funded) health insurance. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 7:37 am
The court explained that in medical malpractice actions in the District of Columbia, the plaintiff must establish a national standard of care through expert testimony. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Calls to overrule District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed and reinstated the charges against Fischer (as well as those against two other men). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:22 am
The Sacklers paid $4 billion under the original deal, and later increased to $6 billion when the eight states and District of Columbia involved in the proceedings took issue with the original amount. 95% of the governments and individuals involved voted to approve the settlement. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
The District of Columbia does require disclosure of Beneficial Ownership information. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the ATF rule, creating a circuit split. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
READ MORE The District of Columbia Unveils an AI-Powered Career Platform Career Ready DC, a new AI-matching technology platform from the DC Department of Employment Services and Eightfold AI, aims to help match residents with employment opportunities more efficiently and equitably. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
READ MORE The District of Columbia Unveils an AI-Powered Career Platform Career Ready DC, a new AI-matching technology platform from the DC Department of Employment Services and Eightfold AI, aims to help match residents with employment opportunities more efficiently and equitably. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
It’s also unclear to what extent such a rule would change the law in the 15 states—plus the District of Columbia—that already place certain restrictions on the enforcement of noncompete agreements for physicians (some covering health-care professionals more broadly), not to mention the four states that have general restrictions on noncompete agreements. [read post]
