Search for: "GRAY v. US " Results 201 - 220 of 1,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
(a case in which the Gray Blogger was amicus counsel) In Lanza the US Supreme Court ruled that where the manufacturing and sale of a product bearing a copyrighted work takes place abroad, such a sale does not take place under the laws of the US and the sale does not, therefore, constitute a valid first sale so as to exhaust the copyright owner’s rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:58 pm by law shucks
Ropes v Kirkland Ropes Snags $1.1bn LBO from K&E Wilmer, Ropes on ZipCar IPO [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 6:43 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Kenneth Tafoya, No. 107,684 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); DUIHeather CessnaImproper use of prior convictions for enhancementState v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:04 am
And as it turned out, though it's beside the point, Gray used a different knife in the homicide. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Fleming (pic) claimed five articles published in 2008 and 2009 in The Sunday Mail, and Adelaide Now, in which his alleged victims used the pseudonyms “Richard”, “Jane” and “Jenny”, defamed him. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 10:33 am by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Similarly, under the federal Jones Act, it may be negligence to use improper or defective equipment. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:21 pm by The Complex Litigator
 Sadly, that judgment of about $4 million was set aside by the trial court after it concluded that Michael Gray, Vice President and General Counsel for the defendant, could use his own neglect to set aside the default that he, in his capacity as corporate officer, knew about all along. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Gray (2014) 58 Cal.4th 901, 909 (Gray).) [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Target Corp., July 15, 2014, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog Florida Appeals Court Refuses to Order Neurological Exam Absent Good Cause in Negligence Case: Gray v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
  The issue up for debate was based on Ross River Dena v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  At issue in Simmons v. [read post]