Search for: "GROUND v DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS" Results 201 - 220 of 316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm by Jay Stanley
That’s the classic example, in Boston, where they were literally under the highway. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm by Jay Stanley
That’s the classic example, in Boston, where they were literally under the highway. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Now, Levine v Harriton & Furrer, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01401 ; Appellate Division, Third Department discusses the same subject, this time for an engineer. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm by Orin Kerr
Peoria, 722 F. 2d 468, 475 (CA9 1983), overruled on other grounds, Hodgers-Durgin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Utah Highway Patrol Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by Todd Janzen
 As a result of National Pork Producers v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Ohio Department of Highway Safety, 635 F.2d 1195, 1204 (6th Cir. 1980). [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Justice Department obtained nine extensions of Supreme Court deadlines for answering the petition. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:46 pm
It is important to consider sealing/expunging the record because future employers may do a back ground search on you to determine your history. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
While defendant stood on the side of the highway with an agent, waiting for the ambulance that police had called to arrive, he asked the agent whether he was Jewish and immediately began to lecture him on problems with Judaism. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Reisner v Litman & Litman, P.C. 2012 NY Slip Op 03428   Decided on May 1, 2012   The Appellate Division, Second Department  reverses and issues a blanket finding that neither the County nor the Contractor "could" have been liable. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Plaintiffs' majority ownership of the notes was not a ground to refuse to apply the no-action clause. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Madelaine Lane
Department of Human Services Director (“DHS”), Case No. 144913. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:31 am by Susan Brenner
  Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Justice Department did not use its options of slowing down the progress of the cases toward the Supreme Court, indicating that it, too, wanted a prompt decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Now, Levine v Harriton & Furrer, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01401 ; Decided on February 23, 2012; Appellate Division, Third Department  discusses the same subject, this time for an engineer. [read post]