Search for: "Garland v. Downes"
Results 201 - 220
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
The Republicans’ strategy seems likely to prove successful; if so, it will have thwarted the general shift to the left by the court that almost certainly would have occurred if Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:15 am
President Obama, having nominated federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland, was already a lame duck and could not get the Senate to provide the advice and consent required by the U. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” Amy Howe covers the expiration of Garland’s nomination for this blog. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court requested supplemental briefing in Jennings v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
The only voters who seemed to care about the Supreme Court were the conservatives who want to see Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
That said, I think Judge Garland’s record on the D.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; the lawyer “has not been demanding a specific outcome on the Garland nomination, but he is seeking an up-or-down vote in the post-election Senate session. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” In an op-ed in USA Today, Ilann Maazel argues that “Senate Democrats should vow to filibuster any Trump Supreme Court nominee until Garland gets an up-or-down vote in the Senate. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
” At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that after Chief Judge Merrick Garland returns to his job on the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:24 am
Kagan referred the request to the full court, which turned it down by a unanimous vote. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Helmerich & Payne points to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Bell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:57 am
” In Education Week, Mark Walsh takes a look at Fry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Both Chief Judge Garland and Judge Srinivasan recused themselves. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:02 am
” For his part, Trump suggested that Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:53 am
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
Constitution Daily reports on Hernandez v. [read post]
