Search for: "Georges v. United Nations" Results 201 - 220 of 1,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These topics both reveal the imperial nature of expansion and help to explain the difficulties in recognizing it as such.Chief Justice John Marshall famously ruled in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
On Friday morning, President Donald Trump said he would declare a national emergency to allocate more funds to expand walls or barriers at the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Here is the abstract: In a 5-4 decision split along ideological lines, the Supreme Court on May 21 held in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
To an observer from the United States, one of the most striking things about Israel, and the Middle East in general, is how small it is. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Galloway, (Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Forthcoming).George P. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:46 pm by Lawrence Solum
Finally, Anti-Corruption Principle has entered the public discourse: George Will excoriated Teachout’s article in his nationally syndicated column. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Center at George Washington University Law School (YouTube). [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am by Mark Nevitt
The annual climate summit, the 29th session of the United Nations Conference of Parties (COP29), concluded this week in Baku, Azerbaijan. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 4:41 am by SHG
His 2017 win in Bristol Myers Squibb v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]