Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2022, 7:31 am
The Court held a further evidentiary hearing and contacted the United States Department of State for assistance. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
In connection with political elections--especially in the United States--the term "comeback kid" is often used for candidates who gain momentum after a difficult start, typically in situations in which many observers thought a campaign was over before it had really begun. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
TCL and Philips v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:11 am
(see Jacobsen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
" That question has just been answered: Moderna just announced that they filed parallel patent infringement complaints against Pfizer and BioNTech "for infringing patents central to Moderna's innovative mRNA technology platform" in the United States and Germany.The U.S. complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which is precisely the venue Pfizer and BioNTech picked for their… [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
Since OPPO's indefinite withdrawal from the German market became known earlier this month, I've been hoping for more information on the state of play between the smartphone maker and Nokia. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 7:37 am
Duchimaza v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm
OPPO hasn't closed down its German subsidiary, and customers continue to receive support; and unlike in the Colombian Ericsson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Even in the founding era, a number of influential people thought those in the new United States were diverse enough to be worrisome—there were those German-speakers in Pennsylvania; there were Quakers, Catholics, and Jews; people living in southern states and those on the western frontier were seen as having such different values from those in the northern Atlantic states that it was hard to imagine how they might form a single union.[2]Sandy argues… [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:28 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
We expect better from an attorney representing the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In 2013, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am
We just don't know yet.Here's the U.S. complaint:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22121278-22-07-25-pfizer-biontech-dj-non-infr-complaint-v-curevacCureVac's German complaint is not seeking an injunction--just fair compensation. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm
Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted IPCom's December 2021 motion to dismiss an amended complaint by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary that alleged breach of contract, monopolization in violation of U.S. antitrust law (Sherman Act Sec. 2), and sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of two IPCom patents. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
A German citizen has brought a lawsuit against the European Commission alleging violations of the EU GDPR. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
" Five of the Justices in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
