Search for: "Gill v. Wells" Results 201 - 220 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
 Accordingly this Kat is particularly pleased to hear this news from his friends Robert Buchan and Gill Grassie (Brodies LLP), who bring him the following tidings, on the subject of "super injunctions", no less: It is often said it is key that justice be seen to be done. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
GLAD’s petition for certiorari in Pedersen comes after the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), the congressional leadership body that is defending DOMA, and the Department of Justice each requested certiorari in our First Circuit Court DOMA challenge, Gill v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friend Ian Gill reports on a recent cautionary tale from the UK. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
 Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am by Amanda Frost
One illuminating example of this behavior came last year in the oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:04 am by Eric Citron
Based on the disposition of the cases decided this term, and the unwillingness of any other members of the conservative majority to join in the opinion authored by Justice Elena Kagan in Gill v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Also destined for certiorari is Gill v Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Of note:  Perry is not the only "gay-rights" case percolating through the federal courts at the moment; also destined for certiorari is Gill v Office of Personnel Management. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
The ability to cover up data security breaches simply encourages complacency and rewards incompetence.Par ailleurs, la plus grande vérité de son article, et la plus effrayante, est la suivante:There is also the uncomfortable fact that despite the much-heralded influx of sophisticated criminals into the arena, many attackers are still pimply-faced teenagers, with automated hacking tools.If companies packed to the gills with highly paid executives with fancy… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:06 pm by Jeralyn
In the 1895 Supreme Court decision, Coffin v. [read post]