Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 201 - 220
of 75,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 11:42 am
They also argued that the landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that the EEOC relied upon, Bostock v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:41 am
An academic account would have given that moment a more prominent place. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
Comment We will see if Sovereign appeal further, although given the Court of Appeal’s decision Avon Ground Rents v Canary Gateway, it would be hard to revisit the definition of ‘long lease’. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
This provision ensures that the state with the closest connection to the child is given priority in deciding custody matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:10 am
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently addressed this issue in Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a significant ruling in Naranjo v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:19 am
Bustamante v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:46 am
Laird v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am
Guest UPCKats, Agathe Michel-de Cazotte and Hiske Roos (Carpmaels), examined the need for sufficient certainty on validity and infringement, which was considered in another decision during the 10x Genomics v NanoString litigation. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Voters should, among other things, be given clear information about how a party is using their data, be told if a political party is using profiling techniques and understand if and how they are being targeted by social media advertising. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
As NRA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:38 pm
In State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:42 am
The Federal Court has issued a landmark decision (Blacklock’s Reports v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
If Buckley v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
From Steinbuch v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:12 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:25 am
The O’Kroley v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:00 am
But after he suffered a heart attack, back in December 2020, and returned to work, the company encouraged him to retire (given his age and medical condition), and later fired him on those same grounds.Believing that such conduct violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
(Note that there have been statements from some Supreme Court justices that suggest that this standard that arose in a case, NY Times v. [read post]
