Search for: "Gonzales v. State of California" Results 201 - 220 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
Chamber of CommerceAmicus brief of the Defense BarAmicus brief of Retail Litigation Center, Inc.Amicus brief of Altria Group et al.Amicus brief of the Equal Employment Advisory CouncilAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationAmicus brief of Washington Legal FoundationAmicus brief of California Employment Law CouncilPetitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
The case accepted by the justices comes from California, where a law passed in 2000 prohibits employers from using money they receive from the state to oppose or support unionization efforts. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  (Nor does this case remotely resemble Mooppan's hypothetical in which a state prison allows contractor or employee prison guards to bring peyote into the facility but not to bring in hoasca tea (a reference to the discriminatory treatment at issue in the Court's decision in Gonzales O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal  (2006)). [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Ex Parte Michael Gonzales,  NO. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
In addition, each state has a national guard commanded by the state's governor and coordinated by the National Guard Bureau. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
Colorado, along with others from the term such as Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]