Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 201 - 220 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 11:11 am by Kristen Bartlett
TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc., comes on the heels of the Delaware Court of Chancery’s forum bylaw ruling in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The Circuit Court refused to certify the class and granted the Board summary judgment, but the Appellate Court reversed. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
  The Court needs to choose which case to grant; the cases may also have been relisted so they can be considered together with Ligon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 4:15 am
As a result, the Hearing Officer concluded that the disciplinary charges against Peters were moot and granted her motion to dismiss the charges. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:32 am
Citing Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the Appellate Division said that Supreme Court “exceeded the scope of its review,” which is to determine “whether ‘some credible evidence’ supported the Medical Board's determination as to disability. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
 1145 [requirement that board issue disciplinary decision is directory].)These presumptions are rebuttable. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:09 am
Roman KINGS COUNTYEmploymentMedical Board's, Board of Trustees' Decision Denying Disability Retirement Is Upheld Matter of DiGangi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 11:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Retirement Board of Firemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 95 Ill. 2d 211 (1983). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:11 am
” Dismissing the appeal, the Commissioner pointed out that Section 1709(33) of the Education Law grants a board of education broad authority to manage the educational affairs of the district. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
Busk — right to overtime pay for time spent in after-hours screening as a measure to prevent workplace theft North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
The Court of Appeals addressed the impact of Section 13-173.1 in Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804, decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System. [read post]