Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 201 - 220 of 1,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
Railroad Retirement Board (Nov. 2): Whether, under federal laws governing benefits for railroad workers, the Railroad Retirement Board’s denial of a request to reopen an earlier benefits determination is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:40 am
August 25, 2020 - 2 PM: Grant Toland, Alexander Prenta and Russ Bennet v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Connecticut’s property tax burdens are rising rapidly, with the state’s effective property tax rates on owner-occupied housing now among the highest in the country at 1.7 percent of housing value. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
In a statement, California Air Resources Board Chair Mary D. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The ongoing retirement of the baby-boom generation has reduced the growth of the working-age population to just about zero. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
Both judgments were penned by Stratas, J.A.The first FCA decision is Entertainment Software Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]