Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Ayers (9th Cir. 2015) (granting pseudonymity where a plaintiff-inmate made a "strong showing, based on the affidavit of a highly-qualified correctional expert," that disclosure of repeated episodes of extreme sexual abuse while incarcerated "would create a significant risk of severe harm at the hands of other inmates, a risk to which [the plaintiff] would be quite vulnerable"); cf. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:53 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Clapper v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 1878, in Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
Indeed, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act grants disabled persons the right to full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
" That is, in fact, the way the whole patent prosecution process works: while third parties may submit prior art and oppose grants, most of the time a patent examiner is faced with a patent attorney who will keep fighting until the patent is granted or [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
The Supreme Court will therefore have to decide whether the broad interpretation remains correct or whether to depart from Buchanan (under the Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:35 pm
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
Department of the Interior v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
And our powers of self-correction are [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Andy Biggs (R-AZ) and Pat Fallon (R-TX), has proposed impeaching Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his role in carrying out Biden’s immigration policies. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm
Justice Neil Gorsuch noted that a majority of the Court had granted state standing in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
