Search for: "Grant v. Department of Veterans"
Results 201 - 220
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm
The Federal Circuit applies a presumption that the medical professionals whom the Department of Veterans Affairs uses to evaluate these disabled veterans are competent to provide their opinions on any medical issues, which – veterans argue – then imposes a difficult burden on disabled veterans to show that the examiners are not in fact competent. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:00 pm
Department of the Interior (Water Rights; Trust Breach)Dutchover v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm
In Yonemoto v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:07 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Kramer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 8:29 am
Scollick v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Amicus brief of Veterans' Equal Rights Protection Advocacy (forthcoming)Petitioner's reply Title: Ochoa v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 2:02 am
” Howard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
Grant Thornton LLP v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
On March 12, 2008, the 17-year fire department veteran headed a company that responded to a fire in a high-rise apartment. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Community College v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
The other two newly granted cases are Pepper v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 7:20 am
The Department appealed as to the eleven workers, and the Court granted certification. 248 N.J. 400 (2021). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
In the third granted case, Haywood v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Sec'y Veterans Affairs, No. 2007-7008 38 C.F.R. section 1.218(a)(14), which governs the conduct of visitors on property under the charge and control of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and prohibits visitors to VA property from engaging in "demonstrations" unless authorized by the head of the facility involved, was validly promulgated and does not on its face violate the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:36 am
Algieri with the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General’s Northeast Field Office. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
The veteran was employed as a Sergeant with the Rice County Sheriff's Department. [read post]
