Search for: "Graves v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
H.R.184: To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
On July 28, 2020, Dubikovskyy learned Goun and M.D. had traveled to the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Eight Amendment Ban on Cruel and Unusual Punishment The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:41 pm
In Abbott v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:36 am
It makes things so much more efficient when you're willing to dig your own grave. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
United States, the 1944 decision that backed the internment of Japanese citizens and immigrants based on their race, “was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history and—to be clear—has no place in law under the Constitution. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:01 am
The use of automated license plate readers started off quietly in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Because the United States is a signatory of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”), the Mother in Cillikova v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
There is probably some stirring in the grave of Hugo Black. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:02 pm
Sessions v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:17 pm
Section 3 states that "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the… [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 1:22 pm
Section 3 states that "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:35 am
At the Huffington Post, Fatima Goss Graves discusses the potential implications of the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Garner v Harris, 2922 WL 193470066 (E.D. Texas, 2022)
26 May 2023, 12:57 pm
[United Kingdom] [Petition denied][Grave Risk of Harm][Age and Maturity defense] In Garner v Harris, 2922 WL 193470066 (E.D. [read post]
