Search for: "H.L."
Results 201 - 220
of 263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
He rejected the Appellant’s submission based on Prudential Assurance v The London Residual Body H.L. [1992] 2 AC 386 that the tenancy was a periodic tenancy terminable on that basis and that any provision which purported to vary that would mean that the lease was of an uncertain duration and would therefore be void. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 7:22 pm
" - H.L. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:11 pm
The snappy response is to quote H.L. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
Wardlaw, [1956] 1 All E.R. 615 (H.L.) [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:36 pm
As H.L. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 10:58 pm
Given that, as H.L. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:50 pm
" -- H.L. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:21 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal release a landmark case in the area in H.L. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:32 pm
Nobody reads H.L. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:05 pm
While working on something tangentially related, I've come across several "conservative" books, blog posts, and articles asserting that H.L. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 5:45 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has found in H.L. v United Kingdom that certain deprivations of liberty of 'informal' patients in England breached Article 5 . [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
., [2002] 3 All ER 305 (H.L.) - although a UK case, it may well be considered persuasive in Canada.) [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:59 pm
Query: What if H.L Mencken had been a lawyer, too? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:14 pm
Dunn (1893), 6 R. 67 (H.L.) provides well understood guidance on the consequences that flow from the failure of a party to cross-examine on a given issue or to put given propositions to a witness. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:01 am
"- H.L. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
It's an H.L. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
-H.L. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:39 am
Likewise, H.L. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:06 am
Knight [1892] A.C. 298 (H.L.) at 302, and the leading Canadian case, Friends of the Oldman River Society v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:57 am
" - H.L. [read post]
