Search for: "HUBBARD V US"
Results 201 - 210
of 210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
" Senior's brief also cites case precedent, including Tonkery v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
The term “profile” is used 3x in the CPRA but also not defined. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
The case is Jones v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Box 30676 Lansing, MI 48909-8176 Phone: (517) 373-8230; (800) 803-7174 (Toll Free) Fax: (517) 373-4092 TDD: (517) 373-4096 Web: http://www.miseniors.net AARP Michigan State Office 309 North Washington Square, Suite 110 Lansing MI, 48933 Phone: (517) 482-2772 Fax: (517) 482-2794 TTY: (877) 434-7598 (Toll Free) E-mail: miaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.org/mi ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Great Lakes ADA and Accessible IT Center University of Illinois/Chicago… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
