Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 201 - 220 of 1,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
That exercise is primarily a function of national courts, in respect of which states enjoy a margin of appreciation, subject to the supervision of the Strasbourg Court [96] – [97]. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
It emphasised the importance of discussion around the State’s monopoly on the use of force, but set that against P. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In 2022, the Federal Circuit issued a Judge Hughes decision in IBM v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
It was a misdirection to say one needed to broadly compensate each individual. 1209: Ms Demetriou QC says it is clear that the Tribunal saw there as being a governing principle that individual claimants must be restored to position they would have been in but for the infringement, which is wrong as a matter of statutory construction. 1202: Ms Demetriou QC states that the compensatory principle is not irrelevant at distribution stage, but it is not a statutory requirement. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Roger Falk and Christopher Hughes won in State v. [read post]