Search for: "Hall v. State of California"
Results 201 - 220
of 782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
In a court case, "the government" always refers to one party on one side of the v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:45 am
” Nov. 5, 2015, noon, Berkeley CA, University of California Berkeley Hall School of Law: “The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
Hall, which allowed a state to be sued without its consent in another state’s courts. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
No use crying about past decisions In their opposition to the city’s demurrer, the Yees relied almost entirely on Hall v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, 1993 Education Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, California J.D. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
Hall v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 10:59 am
In the case, Simon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:33 am
See, e.g., Omega World Travel, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
The court also rejected claims that plaintiff was removed from the monthly Ramadan fast list without his consent and was wrongly denied a bag meal for breaking the fast at the Eid celebration.In Hall v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall), Kemp served as Senior Executive Editor of the California Law Review and worked as a summer intern with the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.Follow @DavidSKemp on Twitter [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:59 am
The rule of law stated in Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Along the way, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel in the Northern District of California issued the crucial first ruling that found that code is speech and so is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
