Search for: "Hamburg v. Hamburg" Results 201 - 220 of 615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 3:11 am
That’s the question…DesignsMichael Risch of Written Description provides a neat summary of the Apple v Samsung US design case, and predicts that Samsung is unlikely to win on appeal: A Couple Thoughts on Apple v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
PatentsGetting the priorities rightPatently-Oanalyses the Federal Circuit decision in Droplets, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm
In support of its cross motion, Arch established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating the applicability of an exclusion in Corbel's policy (see Platek v Town of Hamburg, 24 NY3d 688, 694; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324-325). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
“”Administrative State Is THE Leading Threat to Civil Liberties of Our Era'”: Nick Gillespie interview with Philip Hamburger at Reason; Beyond the deference debates: White House Counsel Don McGahn speaks on Chenery I v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
The CJEU took on this question very recently in a very interesting decision.The case of Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
” Auer deference—which came from the Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Auer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
Philips v Asustek and HTCGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy cuts her patent litigation teeth on smartphones - She had a wave of nostalgia delving into the acronyms of mobile telecommunications standards in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Asustek Computer Incorporation, HTC Corporation and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1526. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]