Search for: "Hamdi v. Rumsfeld"
Results 201 - 220
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Bill Moyers' interview of Bruce Fein and impeachment proponent John Nichols is illustrative of how the impeachment movement gives short shrift to the most effective tool for checking an out of control President - the Spending Power. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Rumsfeld (2006) and Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
In support, the government cites the plurality’s statement in Hamdi v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
Rumsfeld, in 2004. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 pm
Rumsfeld, which in turn built on Mathews v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Hamdi can be held as illegal combatant but must have access to courts (June 28, 2004)36. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm
This past Monday, March 12, the Trump administration met its deadline to provide Congress with a “report on the legal and policy frameworks for the United States’ use of military force and related national security operations[,]”—a new requirement imposed by Section 1264 of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2018 (since codified at 50 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Former President Donald Trump has promised voters that, if re-elected, he would “immediately” invoke the Alien Enemies Act to effect mass deportations of non-citizens from Mexico. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
The lawyers point out that the Authorization for the Use of Military Force in Afghanistan, passed in 2001, says nothing explicit about detention powers, and that the Supreme Court, in cases such as Hamdi v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Thomas I. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Hamdi v. [read post]
12 May 2007, 10:03 pm
(CSRTs were set up by the Pentagon at Guantanamo Bay after the Supreme Court ruling in Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Editorial pages and blogs have been overrun in the past couple of weeks with analyses and speculation about the detainee provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, which the President has just signed into law. [read post]
