Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour"
Results 201 - 220
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Here's my table attempting a summary of recent CJEU case law http://t.co/prOYQYqt3K -> Donald Trump Receives Legal Threat Over Use of Aerosmith's "Dream On" http://t.co/mz1EwXAVe2 -> Interview: Brett Wilson v Persons Unknown, corporate defamation claims and claims against anonymous third parties https://t.co/tDsgDfNcXo -> (Un)Safe Harbour: Stop! [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
"Just less than three years after the Court decided Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:10 pm
The case is Associated British Ports v Tata Steel UK Limited. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Tranquil Harbour Dev., LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 4:06 am
[Harbour Arch Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Capital Propfund 4 (Pty) Ltd [2021] ZASCA 108 (5 August 2021)] [read post]
Case Comment: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A (Respondent) v E.N.E. Kos 1 Limited (Appellant) [2012] UKSC 17
6 Aug 2012, 2:34 am
Gaudet v Brown (1873) and Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield (1874). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
A lively discussion of the English approach to obviousness as applied in the Hospira v Genotech patent revocation application. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm
Commissioner Hampton’s reasoning is consistent with other decisions of the Commission, including the Full Bench’s decision in Toms v Harbour City Ferries Pty Ltd [2015] FWAFB 6249, which focused on “obedience to the policy”, rather than whether the drug test established that the worker was ‘impaired’ (in a scientific sense) as a result of drug use.[4] Commissioner Hampton noted that it was neither reasonable nor workable to expect Coles “to… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
However, the PPT also includes a safe harbour provision where it can be demonstrated that the benefit was received in circumstances that were in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:20 pm
” Royal Harbour Yacht Club Marina Condo. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:39 am
United States, 459 F.3d 220 (2d Cir. 2006) (better known as “Castle Harbour“) and the Fourth Circuit’s holding in Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund LLC 2001 v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 3:15 am
https://t.co/8JI0lmGBKb -> My interview on legality of Kodi boxes on FairchildTV https://t.co/euZB7Lz9Kf -> Providing hyperlink infringes communication right in Scottish decision MACKIE V MAXI CONSTRUCTION [2017] ScotSC 11 https://t.co/hrVP4kHkwI -> Landlord responsibility for sale of counterfeit goods Louis Vuitton v Zekria Wakilzada, 2017 ONSC 2 https://t.co/AyrxbrQ0Eb -> Have Internet Giants Taken Over Creative Culture? [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
The ISPs in this action are innocent, in that they would not incur liability for trade mark infringement under English law, even in the absence of the safe harbour provisions in the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
-> What the groundbreaking Schrems v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-03-08 https://t.co/cYHJ3JDjVj 2018-03-09 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-03-08 https://t.co/Xkdco9Ke6P 2018-03-09 German design law on the brink of change following yesterday's CJEU decision in DOCERAM v CeramTec https://t.co/b9EWGn98aI 2018-03-09 9th Circuit ‘slam-dunks’ claim of copyright infringement by Nike photograph of Michael Jordan and ‘Jumpman’ logo https://t.co/7j3E4AIS5W 2018-03-09 Determining damages… [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:12 am
Any vessel that docks in the UK more than 120 times per year must provide harbour authorities a “wage equivalence declaration”, stating they pay the equivalent of at least UK minimum wage. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
The individual had been harbouring a grudge against Morrisons stemming from a previous disciplinary issue, and took the opportunity to copy the data from the USB stick and post it online. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
But it does not follow that being outside the safe harbour is automatically an abuse. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 7:47 pm
(For a good summary of the case law, see Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corp (1989) 16 IPR 431 at 440-441 per Hill J.) [read post]
