Search for: "Harms v. IRS" Results 201 - 220 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am by Sasha Volokh
Moreover, such review is not guaranteed to occur before antitrust harm is suffered. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, in Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587, the first and leading case on privacy of communications, Hamilton P awarded the plaintiffs a total of £50,000 damages for the significant distress that they suffered from the defendants’ infringement of their constitutional right to privacy ([1987] 1 IR 587, 594-595). [read post]