Search for: "Harper v. Harper"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2022, 7:32 am
A major issue in the Moore v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
I'd blogged extensively on the Ninth Circuit's Harper v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Amber Taylor reflects on Harper v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument tomorrow in Moore v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:22 am
In Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:55 am
It begins: On Dec. 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:54 pm
The Court has asked for another round of briefing on what the heck should happen in Moore v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 4:30 pm
Harper case. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:11 pm
I wrote this column for Slate on how Congress could nullify the North Carolina legislators’ claim in Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:28 pm
Carolyn Shapiro, Dan Tokaji, and I are the amici in this brief in Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
Adam Liptak (@adamliptak), has this piece in The NY Times on this emergency application by North Carolina Republicans seeking a stay of the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in the partisan gerrymandering case of Harper v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:03 am
Quite appropriately, Moore v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
When NC filed its opening brief in the independent state legislature case, Moore v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 7:18 pm
BPC: ollowing the Supreme Court’s decision to hear Moore v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:51 am
Medical experts and conflicting medical opinionsHarper v McCall, App. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:03 pm
Harper Decision appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
However, Moore v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:55 am
Harper v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
As eloquently stated by then-Chief Justice Dickson, the Charter safeguards minorities from the “tyranny of the majority” (R. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 5:38 am
This was the question the Court of Appeals of Maryland faced in Harper v. [read post]